Open maol-corteva opened 3 years ago
BTW, trying older versions of seqtk does not change the result, so if this is an issue, it has been in there for a long time. Still, I don't know if others can replicate what I am seeing.
Cheers... and thanks for the awesome seqtk library.
recently I found that seqtk rename on long reads (not sure which length threshold) produces duplicate IDs for the first 10 sets of sequences (naming them as 1..1..2..2..3..3..4..4..5..5..6..7..8).... However it works fine for short reads.
I have tried in 4 different isoseq runs (standard PacBio isoseq pipe) and all generated same duplicate ids. Using the optional prefix does not affect numbering (problem persists).
Can someone verify this?