Open apuignav opened 6 years ago
Well, the reason why I decided to add the IPCHI2
was that from the physics point of view it's more intuitive than the DIRA
shown there. At the same time I agree that in current representation it's way too complicated.
Btw, if we use Bender, doesn't it become simpler?
The lesson can be made a lot nicer, without losing material, if we use the DaVinciPVTools.Conf
module.
>>> from DaVinciPVTools.Conf import P2PVWithIPChi2
>>> print P2PVWithIPChi2()
/***** Public AlgTool GenericParticle2PVRelator<_p2PVWithIPChi2, OfflineDistanceCalculatorName>/GenericParticle2PVRelator<_p2PVWithIPChi2, OfflineDistanceCalculatorName> *****
|-ExtraOutputs = [] (default: [])
|-StatTableHeader = ' | Counter | # | sum | mean/eff^* | rms/err^* | min | max |'
|-AuditReinitialize = False
|-ErrorsPrint = True
|-AuditRestart = False
|-StatEntityList = [] (default: [])
|-RootInTES = ''
|-AuditFinalize = False
|-RegularRowFormat = ' | %|-48.48s|%|50t||%|10d| |%|11.7g| |%|#11.5g| |%|#11.5g| |%|#12.5g| |%|#12.5g| |'
|-UseEfficiencyRowFormat = True
|-ContextService = 'AlgContextSvc'
|-AuditTools = False
|-MonitorService = 'MonitorSvc'
|-AuditInitialize = False
|-TypePrint = True
|-OutputLevel = 0
|-StatPrint = True
|-ExtraInputs = [] (default: [])
|-AuditStop = False
|-Context = ''
|-PropertiesPrint = False
|-AuditStart = False
|-EfficiencyRowFormat = ' |*%|-48.48s|%|50t||%|10d| |%|11.5g| |(%|#9.6g| +- %|-#9.6g|)%%| ------- | ------- |'
|-CounterList = ['.*'] (default: ['.*'])
\----- (End of Public AlgTool GenericParticle2PVRelator<_p2PVWithIPChi2, OfflineDistanceCalculatorName>/GenericParticle2PVRelator<_p2PVWithIPChi2, OfflineDistanceCalculatorName>) -----
So we should be able to change the example to:
from DaVinciPVTools.Conf import P2PVWithIPChi2
pv_finder_tool = P2PVWithIPChi2()
pvs = evt['/Event/Rec/Vertex/Primary']
best_pv = pv_finder_tool.relatedPV(cand, pvs)
I haven't tested it.
Hi,
@vlisovsk I understand the rationale (and I agree!), but it is "too much magic", especially considering most of the tool loading concepts have not been properly introduced. I would stick with the DIRA or go with @alexpearce's solution, just for the sake of simplicity.
Regarding Bender, a decision was made a long time ago (and I think we still stand by it) to show the basic building blocks, and Bender adds too many "decorations" to be basic, so it doesn't help in the learning process.
After teaching it, some of the changes #26 have added some material thats is too complicated and doesn't add much to the discussion (the
IPCHI2
). I think we should roll these back when we update the lesson as mentioned in #58.