Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Thanks a lot. John, can you look into this?
Original comment by erwin.coumans
on 19 Jan 2009 at 10:09
Original comment by erwin.coumans
on 19 Jan 2009 at 10:10
Sébastien,
I committed something based on your patch. I had to undo the changes you made to
disable the demos from building. Thanks for the contribution.
John
Original comment by john.mcc...@gmail.com
on 26 Jan 2009 at 9:44
Original comment by john.mcc...@gmail.com
on 26 Jan 2009 at 9:44
John,
Thanks for considering the patch!
Could it be possible to have the option to disable the demos building?
It helps us as a source distribution where some users might need bullet only
for the
libs and headers.
Sébastien
Original comment by sebfab...@gmail.com
on 27 Jan 2009 at 9:25
Sébastien,
I just committed code so that you can run configure with --disable-demos . Let
me
know if it's not sufficient.
Thanks,
John
Original comment by john.mcc...@gmail.com
on 27 Jan 2009 at 3:39
Thanks John. I tried the latest trunk and it seems good.
I noticed you also re-included the Extras directory into the building process.
Some
of the libs built under the Extras directory are often already available in
Linux
distribution. Are they absolutely needed for the bullet libraries, couldn't we
add
also a --disable-extras?
Original comment by sebfab...@gmail.com
on 27 Jan 2009 at 6:18
Sébastien,
Some of the Bullet demos require the libraries included in Bullet/Extras .
Bullet
isn't intended to be a system wide library. It is intended to be included in
your
project and statically linked in. Given that, I don't think there is enough
benefit
to be able to optionally disable the Extras folder.
John
Original comment by john.mcc...@gmail.com
on 27 Jan 2009 at 7:40
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
sebfab...@gmail.com
on 16 Jan 2009 at 2:51Attachments: