Hey haofu,
Thanks for your release of the ADN code, it really helps me a lot in the MAR research.
I also find another paper called DuDoNet.
It seems they have the same setting, but the performance is different. E.g, the LI performance in ADN is 32dB (PSNR), while the dudonet only 25.5dB.
Do they exploit different experimental settings? I found the source image is 512x512, and the CNNMAR use 512x512 for testing, while DuDonet use 416x416, and the default setting in ADN code is 256x256,
Is 256x256 exploited in ADN? And the normalized way in the default setting?
Hey haofu, Thanks for your release of the ADN code, it really helps me a lot in the MAR research. I also find another paper called DuDoNet. It seems they have the same setting, but the performance is different. E.g, the LI performance in ADN is 32dB (PSNR), while the dudonet only 25.5dB. Do they exploit different experimental settings? I found the source image is 512x512, and the CNNMAR use 512x512 for testing, while DuDonet use 416x416, and the default setting in ADN code is 256x256, Is 256x256 exploited in ADN? And the normalized way in the default setting?