Closed robertosassu closed 2 years ago
Hi @robertosassu , could you detail the problem you are trying to solve some more, please? Would it make sense to rather adjust the upstream config?
Edit: Okay, I got context now (I saw this message first before reading bpf
email). But I think the questions still stands: would it be better to adjust upstream configuration? I don't believe there is a real reason behind the =m
choices (at least I am not aware of any). So if we can just compile them in, that seems more appropriate. It would also be great to check that vmtest.sh
works correctly.
It seems we do not need this pull request anymore given recent upstream proposal: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220818173539.q47uycc2oy5kkezl@muellerd-fedora-PC2BDTX9/T/#u
Let's convert this to a draft until we got clarity upstream.
Upstream change seems to have landed. Closing.
Change the upstream kernel configuration by replacing =m with =y, to force the CI to build everything built-in, since kernel modules are not copied to the virtual machine where selftests run.
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu roberto.sassu@huawei.com