As an author, I want to be able to clearly see the contributions that will be listed for each author so that I can check that the details are correct.
As an author, I want to be able to edit the contributions so that I can correct any mistakes.
Production staff
But what if . . . ?
Considerations
eLife follows the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) for the pre-set contribution options. The idea is to try and standardise contributions, making it clear and transparent what authors have contributed to the work.
Conceptualization
Resources
Data curation
Software
Formal analysis
Supervision
Funding acquisition
Validation
Investigation
Visualization
Methodology
Writing—original draft
Project administration
Writing—review and editing
In our submission system, these options are presented as tick boxes. As some authors want/need other options, we also allow an additional free-text option to allow them to include more specific details, ideally in addition to pre-set options but occasionally replacing them entirely.
Other publishers do not use a controlled vocabulary for contributions e.g. just accommodate the free-text approach. Érudit, for example, don't have a controlled vocabulary and therefore don't need the related attributes on the <role> elements.
The <role> element is going to be used to capture roles as well - see #48, #96.
SciELO capture author contributions as a single footnote rather than including them individually per author. This would perhaps be a specific use of author footnotes (#16).
XML requirements
Each contribution, based on the CRediT taxonomy is captured as a <role> element, which is a direct child of the contrib.
This role element must carry the following attributes:
@vocab, must always carry the value "credit".
@vocab-identifier, must point to the URL for the general CRediT taxonomy
@vocab-term, must identify the particular CRediT term.
@vocab-term-identifier, must point to the URL of the specific CRediT term.
[ Requirement for free text needs to be added - could be @content-type attribute with value of "contribution", but is currently being discussed by JATS4R and publishers using both pre-set and controlled list]
There are some considerations needed for this input around freeform text versus recognised keywords. Medium.com has a pattern that may be worth investigating
Contributions will be included as text captured using
role
elements - pre-set options + optional free text options (see https://trello.com/c/xDiPXFXm/22-author-contributions-no-free-form-text-anymore-just-credit-taxonomy)User Stories
Author
Production staff
But what if . . . ?
Considerations
<role>
elements.<role>
element is going to be used to capture roles as well - see #48, #96.XML requirements
Each contribution, based on the CRediT taxonomy is captured as a
<role>
element, which is a direct child of thecontrib
. Thisrole
element must carry the following attributes:@vocab
, must always carry the value "credit".@vocab-identifier
, must point to the URL for the general CRediT taxonomy@vocab-term
, must identify the particular CRediT term.@vocab-term-identifier
, must point to the URL of the specific CRediT term.[ Requirement for free text needs to be added - could be
@content-type
attribute with value of "contribution", but is currently being discussed by JATS4R and publishers using both pre-set and controlled list]Taken from: https://github.com/elifesciences/TextureRequirements/issues/13