Closed Bronek closed 6 months ago
This did not work out. Turns out the problems with coverage mis-reporting in include/functional/detail/variadic_union.hpp
are not due of the format of the data submitted to codecov.io , but because of the gcovr
limitations/bugs. Fixed properly in #50
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Additional details and impacted files
[![Impacted file tree graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/libfn/functional/pull/49/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=3RHT38SEU0&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=libfn)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/libfn/functional/pull/49?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=libfn) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #49 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 99.3% 99.3% ===================================== Files 19 19 Lines 676 676 Branches 161 161 ===================================== Hits 671 671 Misses 3 3 Partials 2 2 ``` [![Impacted file tree graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/libfn/functional/pull/49/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=3RHT38SEU0&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=libfn)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/libfn/functional/pull/49?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=libfn)