Closed sezero closed 9 months ago
Your choice.
P.S.: I won't be doing that, it's up to you to cook a compatible thing :)
Just now I made a change that replaces JOIN with a foreach. I also verified the work on CMake 3.3, and it just works.
P.S. I think, I'll add the CMake 3.3 CI to verify the compatibiltiy for next times.
Just now I made a change that replaces JOIN with a foreach. I also verified the work on CMake 3.3, and it just works.
Yes: tested, and indeed it works
P.S. I think, I'll add the CMake 3.3 CI to verify the compatibiltiy for next times.
I like seeing conservative guys (in terms of old-versioned tools and software) :))
If only this project hadn't used c++11, and even better if it were written in C :))
C++11 is old enough, and almost every compiler supports it (Except of OpenWatcom that supports it badly, even C++98 has some troubles too). Anyway, the compiler support matters on which platforms and toolkits were wanted to be used. Speaking about compilers, DJGPP allows to use modern C++ and target to DOS platform to work on 386 compulters (the DOS player with my libADLMIDI works on i486DX2 on DOS 6.22 just fine). When developing a library, it's always better to support a wider set of toolchains including old one.
I guess, better to replace it with a foreach function and keep compatibility at least 3.5.