Closed marten-seemann closed 1 year ago
Meta point, reviewing this as a GitHub PR is kind of painful. I would much prefer Notion, Google Docs, or even my own GossipPad. (Joking on the last one)
Meta point, reviewing this as a GitHub PR is kind of painful. I would much prefer Notion, Google Docs, or even my own GossipPad. (Joking on the last one)
Noted. Will use Notion next time. cc @dhuseby @p-shahi as an example for a workflow that doesn't work well on GitHub.
@p-shahi Should we move forward with this blog post? How do we get a header image created?
Should we move forward with this blog post? How do we get a header image created?
Yes let's move forward w/ this however, let's publish https://github.com/libp2p/blog/pull/101 this week and this post next week.
For the header image, I will ask Cake's Internet.dev team
@p-shahi I've incorporated all feedback, except for one comment. Could you help me get this blog post out this week?
Images automagically compressed by Calibre's image-actions ✨
Compression reduced images by 14%, saving 59.97 KB.
Filename | Before | After | Improvement | Visual comparison |
---|---|---|---|---|
src/assets/crypto_tls_header.png |
428.36 KB | 368.39 KB | -14.0% | View diff |
63 images did not require optimisation.
TODOs until publication:
Intended publication date: ~mid August
I'm not 100% sure if we should include the last paragraph here. It doesn't contain a lot that we haven't said publicly (mostly on the QUIC GitHub issue), but do we want to surface it here?