I'm trying to analyse a third-party repository (among others) but this specific one triggers an error with bibliothecary.
To reproduce:
git clone https://github.com/betagouv/signalconso-website
bibliothecary list --trace
I get this error output:
/.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary.rb:83:in `sub': invalid byte sequence in UTF-8 (ArgumentError)
.sub(/^\xEF\xBB\xBF/, "") # remove any Byte Order Marks so JSON, etc don't fail while parsing them.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary.rb:83:in `utf8_string'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/file_info.rb:20:in `contents'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/analyser/matchers.rb:35:in `mapping_entry_match?'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/analyser/matchers.rb:59:in `block in first_matching_mapping_details'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/analyser/matchers.rb:59:in `each'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/analyser/matchers.rb:59:in `find'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/analyser/matchers.rb:59:in `first_matching_mapping_details'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/analyser/matchers.rb:52:in `match_info?'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/runner.rb:41:in `block in applicable_package_managers'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/runner.rb:41:in `select'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/runner.rb:41:in `applicable_package_managers'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/runner.rb:171:in `add_matching_package_managers_for_file_to_list'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/runner.rb:91:in `block in load_file_info_list'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/find.rb:49:in `block (2 levels) in find'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/find.rb:48:in `catch'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/find.rb:48:in `block in find'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/find.rb:43:in `each'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/3.2.0/find.rb:43:in `find'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/runner.rb:84:in `load_file_info_list'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/runner.rb:14:in `analyse'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary.rb:23:in `analyse'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/cli.rb:20:in `block (2 levels) in run'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/commander-5.0.0/lib/commander/command.rb:187:in `call'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/commander-5.0.0/lib/commander/command.rb:157:in `run'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/commander-5.0.0/lib/commander/runner.rb:444:in `run_active_command'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/commander-5.0.0/lib/commander/runner.rb:58:in `run!'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/commander-5.0.0/lib/commander/delegates.rb:18:in `run!'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/lib/bibliothecary/cli.rb:35:in `run'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/lib/ruby/gems/3.2.0/gems/bibliothecary-8.7.6/bin/bibliothecary:8:in `<top (required)>'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/bin/bibliothecary:25:in `load'
from /.../ruby/3.2.2/bin/bibliothecary:25:in `<main>'
Any idea if this an issue with the repository itself, or if bibliothecary is not managing a specific case?
Hi @tiegz ,
I'm trying to analyse a third-party repository (among others) but this specific one triggers an error with
bibliothecary
.To reproduce:
I get this error output:
Any idea if this an issue with the repository itself, or if
bibliothecary
is not managing a specific case?Thank you,