On D&P, clicking on filters after performing a search returns unpredictable results

[libreliodev]

This was discussed on 5/22 between @eprat, @aaamiri and @ddesgue .

Extra development would be needed for filters to work when using cloudsearch.

@aaamiri Please let us know if you want to remove the "filter" for the time being, or launch a new project for this feature

[aaamiri]

@eprat @ddesgue Hello please remove filters we will ad filters eventually. New project will be launched.

Abdol

[libreliodev]

@librelioser The ball is in your court.

[librelioser]

@eprat the search still doesn't work. Ex : http://www.droit-patrimoine.fr/search/lois this page announce 45 results but there is no more than 18 articles

[libreliodev]

@librelioser Can you please remove the filters, as requested by @aaamiri ? This is probably the reason why the wrong number of results is displayed.

[libreliodev]

@aaamiri This issue has been assigned to @librelioser because the filters used are specific to WK, and were developed by Serum.

[libreliodev]

@librelioser In preparation of call tomorrow with @eprat , @aaamiri and @ddesgue, can you please let us know if anything prevents you from following up on this issue, or how much time you need?

[librelioser]

@libreliodev As seemed to be discuss earlier, the filter will be removed for xml.

[libreliodev]

@librelioser

As seemed to be discuss earlier, the filter will be removed for xml.

We're not sure we understand what you mean, but what we understand is that you are going to take care of this issue. Can you tell us how much time you need?

[librelioser]

@libreliodev we will remove the filters from the search

[libreliodev]

@librelioser

we will remove the filters from the search

Thanks, this is clear. How much time please?

[librelioser]

@libreliodev the filter system has to be developp on the dev site. given the time they will be hide on the prod site

[libreliodev]

@librelioser

the filter system has to be developp on the dev site. given the time they will be hide on the prod site

We understand that you are going to disable the filters on the prod site, is this correct?

We do not understand what you are going develop on the dev site, since this issue is only about disabling the filters.

Also, please let us know how much time you need.

[librelioser]

@libreliodev yes we are going to disable the filters on the prod site but it needs to exist in the dev site. We will disable the filter when we set the pages

[libreliodev]

@librelioser

yes we are going to disable the filters on the prod site but it needs to exist in the dev site.

We do not understand what "it needs to exist in the dev site." means. Do you mean you need to keep the filters on the dev site? Why?

We will disable the filter when we set the pages

We do not understand what this means. Can you elaborate?

Again, can you simply let us know when you think you can disable the filters, on both dev and prod?

[librelioser]

@libreliodev we are not giong to disable the filter on both dev and prod because it needs to exist on dev. When we will receive proper links (URL) and will be able to layout those pages, the filters will be disable.

[libreliodev]

@librelioser It would be very helpful and much more efficient if you answered questions asked. We are losing a lot of time for inefficiency reasons.

We asked

We do not understand what "it needs to exist in the dev site." means. Do you mean you need to keep the filters on the dev site? Why?

Can you answer this question?

Also, what do you mean by

When we will receive proper links (URL)

What URL are you expecting?

[librelioser]

@libreliodev We are expecting all the URL in order to layout the pages (Sommaire, magazine and articles). The filter system is going to be hide on the prod site but don't remove it from the dev server

[libreliodev]

@librelioser

We are expecting all the URL in order to layout the pages (Sommaire, magazine and articles).

These URLs have already been provided, please refer to #49, #50, and #51.

The filter system is going to be hide on the prod site but don't remove it from the dev server

Again, for the 3rd time, can you please answer the question: why do you need to keep the filter on the dev server?

[librelioser]

@libreliodev For now, we are just getting to the point in order to get the site on line as soon as possible. the client wants the filters to work eventually

[libreliodev]

@librelioser Please remove the filters from the dev site. We will add them again later if needed.

[librelioser]

@libreliodev I just sent a mail to @eprat about this matter. Please do not remove the filter

[libreliodev]

@librelioser

You mentioned to @eprat that:

Deuxième point, nous avons demandé à ce que les filtres soient conservés sur le serveur dev. Nous allons les masquer dans un premier temps sur le serveur prod. Le client souhaite que ce système de filtres fonctionne.

We understand you think that @aaamiri requested that the filters are kept. This is not true: as you will read again at the beginning of this issue, @aaamiri wrote:

Hello please remove filters we will ad filters eventually. New project will be launched.

In the current project, the filters need to be removed. We cannot keep them on the dev server for the time being.

[libreliodev]

@librelioser

We mentioned earlier:

In the current project, the filters need to be removed. We cannot keep them on the dev server for the time being.

This was discussed again yesterday between @eprat and @aaamiri . @aaamiri confirmed that the filters should also be removed from the dev server for the time being.

[librelioser]

@libreliodev ok, thanks

[libreliodev]

@librelioser Have you disabled the filters?

[librelioser]

@libreliodev it's done.

[libreliodev]

@serverfire OK, thanks.