Closed develroo closed 6 years ago
There should be more errors earlier in the log, can you post them also?
Hmmm looks like an error building openssl. Seems there are whole load of undefined functions.
openssl.o: In function `main':
openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0xf4): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_set_mem_debug_functions'
openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0xf8): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_dbg_get_options'
openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0xfc): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_dbg_set_options'
openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0x100): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_dbg_free'
openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0x104): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_dbg_realloc'
openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0x108): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_dbg_malloc'
openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0x10c): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_set_mem_debug_functions'
openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0x118): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_set_mem_debug_options'
openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0x11c): undefined reference to `CRYPTO_set_mem_debug_options'
...
I have uploaded the output here.
hope that helps.
On 11/10/17 01:32, develroo wrote:
Hmmm looks like an error building openssl. Seems there are whole load of undefined functions.
|openssl.o: In function
main': openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0xf4): undefined reference to
CRYPTO_set_mem_debug_functions' openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0xf8): undefined reference toCRYPTO_dbg_get_options' openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0xfc): undefined reference to
CRYPTO_dbg_set_options' openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0x100): undefined reference toCRYPTO_dbg_free' openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0x104): undefined reference to
CRYPTO_dbg_realloc' openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0x108): undefined reference toCRYPTO_dbg_malloc' openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0x10c): undefined reference to
CRYPTO_set_mem_debug_functions' openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0x118): undefined reference toCRYPTO_set_mem_debug_options' openssl.c:(.text.startup.main+0x11c): undefined reference to
CRYPTO_set_mem_debug_options' ... |I have uploaded the output here https://dropfile.to/7FGmHU4.
hope that helps.
Not the first time I see this error but I'm not sure which is the real cause. However it is something related to the host machine, not to the lede/libremesh SDK. Which distro do you use? Did you install all the dependencies? https://lede-project.org/docs/guide-developer/install-buildsystem
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/libremesh/lime-sdk/issues/28#issuecomment-335637977, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABBo9rE3Htpe7etnevMgeYqjT76BWZ_xks5sq_6WgaJpZM4P0r6Y.
Looks like what you're missing on your machine is libssl-dev
Nope. It is not that. FTR I am using Debian/Testing
dpkg-query -s libssl-dev
Package: libssl-dev
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: libdevel
Installed-Size: 6897
Maintainer: Debian OpenSSL Team <pkg-openssl-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Architecture: amd64
Multi-Arch: same
Source: openssl
Version: 1.1.0f-5
Depends: libssl1.1 (= 1.1.0f-5)
Recommends: libssl-doc
Conflicts: libssl1.0-dev
Description: Secure Sockets Layer toolkit - development files
This package is part of the OpenSSL project's implementation of the SSL
and TLS cryptographic protocols for secure communication over the
Internet.
.
It contains development libraries, header files, and manpages for libssl
and libcrypto.
Homepage: https://www.openssl.org/
I think I found the problem.
Looking at the Makefile in lime-sdk/feeds/base/package/libs/openssl
PKG_NAME:=openssl
PKG_BASE:=1.0.2
PKG_BUGFIX:=k
PKG_VERSION:=$(PKG_BASE)$(PKG_BUGFIX)
PKG_RELEASE:=1
PKG_USE_MIPS16:=0
PKG_BUILD_PARALLEL:=0
PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.gz
PKG_SOURCE_URL:=http://www.openssl.org/source/ \
points to openssl-1.0.2k
k does not exist. The latest patch version is l.
I will edit the Makefile and see if that fixes it.
Yup. That seemed to fix it.
N.B. You also need to include the sha256sum value into the Makefile, which sit alongside the tar.gz file.
Hmmm. I thought I was going to end up with a sysupgrade.bin file instead I end up with others?
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4661 Oct 11 15:17 lede-17.01.2-lime-default-ar71xx-generic-device-tl-wr940n-v4.manifest
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3538944 Oct 11 15:17 lede-17.01.2-lime-default-ar71xx-generic-root.squashfs
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1257014 Oct 11 15:17 lede-17.01.2-lime-default-ar71xx-generic-uImage-lzma.bin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4018388 Oct 11 15:17 lede-17.01.2-lime-default-ar71xx-generic-vmlinux.bin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4023512 Oct 11 15:17 lede-17.01.2-lime-default-ar71xx-generic-vmlinux.elf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1310720 Oct 11 15:17 lede-17.01.2-lime-default-ar71xx-generic-vmlinux.lzma
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1329012 Oct 11 15:17 lede-17.01.2-lime-default-ar71xx-generic-vmlinux-lzma.elf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 862 Oct 11 15:17 sha256sums
What am I missing?
The file with the k does exist https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.2k.tar.gz but maybe they fixed the error you hit in l revision? I don't know, can someone else on Debian testing reproduce this? The compilation was ok for me on Arch.
You didn't get the image compiled 'cause you're using the lime_default flavor (for routers with more than 4 MB of flash memory) for a router with 4 MB flash memory. lime-sdk doesn't warn you yet, this has been reported in #21 For obtaining the images you need to use the lime_mini (without package manager, this is the recommended one) or lime_zero (without web interface) flavors.
@develroo did you manage to compile the image? Shall I close this?
Yes I did build it in the end but there really ought to be a warning of some sort if you are building to a target with or less than 4Mb that you should not build the lime-full image only lime_mini or lime_zero ones.
Thanks for the help. Got there in the end.
there really ought to be a warning of some sort if you are building to a target with or less than 4Mb that you should not build the lime-full image only lime_mini or lime_zero ones.
Yep, I agree, this would be partially solved in #21. A way for detecting routers flash size is also interesting for jefe/chef and has been requested to LEDE people: https://lists.libremesh.org/pipermail/lime-dev/2017-October/000994.html
Hi,
Pulled the git. Followed the instructions and tried to built and image but got the following error.
even running with
J=1 V=s ./cooker -c ar71xx/generic --profile=tl-wr940n-v4 --flavor=lime_default
Not sure where to go now?