search

libressl / openbsd

Source code pulled from OpenBSD for LibreSSL - this includes most of the library and supporting code. The place to contribute to this code is via the OpenBSD CVS tree. Please mail patches to tech@openbsd.org, instead of submitting pull requests, since this tree is often rebased.
231 stars 92 forks source link

Fix & enable Camellia and RC5 #3

Closed lumag closed 10 years ago

bob-beck commented 10 years ago

Merging this will have no effect. It comes from upstream.

lumag commented 10 years ago

@bob-beck what is the proper procedure for submitting patches to libressl codebase then? Which ML should I use?

bob-beck commented 10 years ago

the OpenBSD portions are maintained in OpenBSD - such diffs should go to tech@.

I'll warn you ahead of time that Camielia can't be turned on until it's license status (patent) issues are resolved, We're working on that but any attempt to turn that on will be rejected.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov < notifications@github.com> wrote:

@bob-beck https://github.com/bob-beck what is the proper procedure for submitting patches to libressl codebase then? Which ML should I use?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/pull/3#issuecomment-48940272 .

lumag commented 10 years ago

got that , thank you.

Hmm. Camellia has a patent with royalty-free license. RC5 also has a patent associated with it (and no clear licensing information). It looks like I will submit rc5 compile fix and will have to omit the 'enabling' part.

bob-beck commented 10 years ago

The problem with Camellia is that it's patent and royalty free license status has changed many times, and it's very difficult to nail down what the actual status is at any one given time.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov < notifications@github.com> wrote:

got that , thank you.

Hmm. Camellia has a patent with royalty-free license. RC5 also has a patent associated with it (and no clear licensing information). It looks like I will submit rc5 compile fix and will have to omit the 'enabling' part.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/pull/3#issuecomment-48941948 .