Closed guoyunhe closed 4 years ago
Every MAME prior to circa March 2016 uses the custom MAME license, which is noncommercial, "nonfree"/source-available.
But I agree that the license should be included in all codebases just for clarity.
@hizzlekizzle thanks for information!
I am packaging MAME cores for openSUSE Linux. You may know that most Linux distributions have their license guidelines. The package need to correctly indicate its license.
I read this blog post: https://www.mamedev.org/?p=422
So MAME core is GPL/BSD licensed. :heavy_check_mark:
MAME 2000 and MAME 2010 don't have a license in the repo. :question:
MAME 2003 and MAME 2003+ have a custom license. Are they FOSS or freeware :question: