Open MTWhyte opened 1 year ago
The CI tanked, but we expected this, right?
Thanks @MTWhyte, yes I think I'd expect the CI to tank. Perhaps the test can be made more robust using something similar to:
This way we can merge and everything will be ok!
Thanks @MTWhyte, yes I think I'd expect the CI to tank. Perhaps the test can be made more robust using something similar to:
This way we can merge and everything will be ok!
I think we touched on this the other day, I understand presentation.make
gives a string presentation, whereas fpsemigroup.make
gives a word-type presentation. Just to check: since I'm using the latter here, should this test be independent of the version? Or am I mistaken and in fact make
from both namespaces will use strings?
This PR updates the tests for
orientation_preserving_monoid
andorientation_reversing_monoid
to work with monoid presentation output, rather than semigroup presentation.