Do you think if it would be better to rename the second parameter width to length in *thumbnail related methods?
For me, at the first glance, the name width in documents/code appears like the standard length in x axis strictly. And it misleads when the methods take higher side in consideration and create a 100x200px thumbnail for 400x800px vertical image when width = 200 is specified (with width = 200, it seems as a thumbnail with 200px length in x axis).
Hi,
Do you think if it would be better to rename the second parameter
width
tolength
in*thumbnail
related methods? For me, at the first glance, the namewidth
in documents/code appears like the standard length in x axis strictly. And it misleads when the methods take higher side in consideration and create a 100x200px thumbnail for 400x800px vertical image whenwidth = 200
is specified (withwidth = 200
, it seems as a thumbnail with 200px length in x axis).Thank you