Making sense of web3 & crypto. Introduction to key concepts and ideas. Rigorous, constructive analysis of key claims pro and con. A look at the deeper hopes and aspirations.
All 3 need to be true/plausible for claim to be overall true/plausible.
Frontmatter
Purpose:
[ ] Can find all the claims (automatically)
[ ] Can find all deep dives
[ ] Can find all featured
[ ] Can find all interviews
[ ] For each claim
[ ] have title
[ ] BONUS have description
[ ] evaluation
[ ] Make clear method for logging evidence for claims being made
[ ] Basic option: add to zotero with note
[ ] More advanced: do basic and create a notes page for that article with excerpts
[ ] Show evidence for claims
[ ] Blockquote with citation/link
[ ] If we have a dedicated page for that person/author then link them instead (?)
Other front matter
[ ] title
[ ] description
title:
description: # optional (can fill in later)
category:
- claim: y
# and also optional (default is n)
- featured: y # optional
- interview: y
- deepdive: y
claim:
- evaluation: # options? YY, Y, ?, N, NN
- confidence: # hh, h, m, l, ll (very high to medium to very low)
When creating a claim page I want to know how to structure so i am assisted in my writing and have correct info
Acceptance
Tasks
Notes
Standard structure of analysis
NB: This is a suggestion not a strait-jacket 😄
All 3 need to be true/plausible for claim to be overall true/plausible.
Frontmatter
Purpose:
Other front matter
Reference process