Trying to fix intermittent facade test failures

lightblue-platform / lightblue-migrator

GNU General Public License v3.0

3 stars 13 forks source link

Trying to fix intermittent facade test failures #383

Closed paterczm closed 8 years ago

paterczm commented 8 years ago

For some reason java8 builds take much longer than java7 builds (e.g. https://travis-ci.org/lightblue-platform/lightblue-migrator/builds/142510528). This could be responsible for test failures.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage decreased (-67.7%) to 0.0% when pulling dc550d445a339354168fc3aeb940d06d12760bfc on testfix into dd988c676ea2a4b187521d01b41642935975c42a on master.

bserdar commented 8 years ago

How about using Breakpoint? it is in migrator package.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage decreased (-67.7%) to 0.0% when pulling 1af6889cea0c485d6cb9fa16125873a26b2d636f on testfix into dd988c676ea2a4b187521d01b41642935975c42a on master.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage remained the same at 67.703% when pulling 76abd11501dd28ea29320cbf08288f5741935c53 on testfix into dd988c676ea2a4b187521d01b41642935975c42a on master.

paterczm commented 8 years ago

The java7 build is much faster because it doesn't run tests at all.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 67.703% when pulling da01baf638aa78f7c467886538fa1cc6c44c72d3 on testfix into 09c27b332d88245ef6de169220d0d0b0b54070a6 on master.

dcrissman commented 8 years ago

The java7 build is much faster because it doesn't run tests at all.

That is correct. We do this because the upstream integration tests require jdk8.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 67.496% when pulling 9629a57fa45a410636a7762b81db044d071f028a on testfix into 09c27b332d88245ef6de169220d0d0b0b54070a6 on master.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 67.703% when pulling 453b3c5e4757b3090bdc6af172229c117887a783 on testfix into d1dfc749da0f1a34ae74fbdb49d4c5680b0fbf4c on master.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage decreased (-67.6%) to 0.0% when pulling d015212abd2f3efa54e5c3c2f7961c670e2578e6 on testfix into d1dfc749da0f1a34ae74fbdb49d4c5680b0fbf4c on master.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 67.876% when pulling f1722d05b600f6a6e9d75cf1417066fd2b095ebc on testfix into d1dfc749da0f1a34ae74fbdb49d4c5680b0fbf4c on master.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage decreased (-11.0%) to 56.649% when pulling c6d9992678cf1ae36d91f780e757dfa3e77b2d01 on testfix into d1dfc749da0f1a34ae74fbdb49d4c5680b0fbf4c on master.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage decreased (-67.6%) to 0.0% when pulling 82ae3a39535689a482a51a50655c411584253850 on testfix into d1dfc749da0f1a34ae74fbdb49d4c5680b0fbf4c on master.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage decreased (-11.0%) to 56.649% when pulling a5f389babbb96f6007a9a1debefff463d60628b7 on testfix into d1dfc749da0f1a34ae74fbdb49d4c5680b0fbf4c on master.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage decreased (-11.0%) to 56.649% when pulling 0905da69de4a216b5b2bef406aa99b6e529562c7 on testfix into d1dfc749da0f1a34ae74fbdb49d4c5680b0fbf4c on master.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage decreased (-11.0%) to 56.649% when pulling 8095c69c395c54ecfe4a539dfbf7ff9e874e5b88 on testfix into d1dfc749da0f1a34ae74fbdb49d4c5680b0fbf4c on master.

coveralls commented 8 years ago

Coverage increased (+0.3%) to 67.945% when pulling a0f98dd2571554771c5e855381bd84bea30ad6c9 on testfix into d1dfc749da0f1a34ae74fbdb49d4c5680b0fbf4c on master.

paterczm commented 8 years ago

Took a lot of try and error in travis, but I think I finally got it.