[bug]: Sats remain pending

MichaelAntonFischer commented 1 year ago

Background

Several UTXOs stuck.

Your environment

version of lnd 0.16.4
which operating system (uname -a on *Nix) Debian 11
version of btcd, bitcoind, or other backend bitcoind/neutrino
any other relevant environment details

Steps to reproduce

I have previously had the issue that on my neutrino LND node, some sats would be stuck after channel closes. Normally briefly switching back to bitcoind backend would resolve the issue, but now I have quite a lot of sats stuck for weeks even though I have been back to bitcoind for 5 days since.

{ "utxos": [ { "address_type": 4, "address": "bc1px3c7hh9j74t48fpzpn00ajtfrcp0t7aj3jguqdu39wp6a0203husfg5te9", "amount_sat": 40160, "pk_script": "51203471ebdcb2f55753a4220cdefec9691e02f5fbb28c91c037912b83aebd4f8df9", "outpoint": "4ea9f65089e050ac575c0291ea069685c543b793f6bee9d64533b41e839bed13:0", "confirmations": 0 }, { "address_type": 4, "address": "bc1p9n5spsv7wj4l9ddmur86l3uxrvsfu9a3vl8x8mcdth46rxc6tk5sklcs75", "amount_sat": 5007553, "pk_script": "51202ce900c19e74abf2b5bbe0cfafc7861b209e17b167ce63ef0d5deba19b1a5da9", "outpoint": "f137ecf97a0a7dbfce7dad6f3b7c7cde78586a7869d40e7684347adf6de6eb9f:0", "confirmations": 0 }, { "address_type": 4, "address": "bc1pfgj6uwlz5enhkynvk4vuvvp2q3mgqujs90hhzw40qsm7vl6l8wvqdag6ej", "amount_sat": 264601, "pk_script": "51204a25ae3be2a6677b126cb559c6302a04768072502bef713aaf0437e67f5f3b98", "outpoint": "a7dfabc956af0b11fd693a05cf62edba4a42838a269c5b00ab666fc5240fa4b8:0", "confirmations": 0 }, { "address_type": 4, "address": "bc1p9tymg3l5zqp0rk6702u0eg05ypk5e5pzzrwswdt9zym7kruwd0wshsex8a", "amount_sat": 146312, "pk_script": "51202ac9b447f41002f1db5e7ab8fca1f4206d4cd02210dd0735651137eb0f8e6bdd", "outpoint": "2dc11501735bc56dcfd57feb278d92801dc180cc167975dbf0a6244f296cb5ff:0", "confirmations": 0 },

Expected behaviour

Tell us what should happen

Actual behaviour

Tell us what happens instead

bitromortac commented 1 year ago

Do those UTXOs belong to any sweeps lncli wallet listsweeps --verbose or can you link them to your pending closes?

MichaelAntonFischer commented 1 year ago

Yes, but to be more specific the sats are shown as pending the channels are shown as closed. { "tx_hash": "f137ecf97a0a7dbfce7dad6f3b7c7cde78586a7869d40e7684347adf6de6eb9f", "amount": 147, "time_stamp": 1693944440, "dest_addresses": [ "bc1p9n5spsv7wj4l9ddmur86l3uxrvsfu9a3vl8x8mcdth46rxc6tk5sklcs75" ], "output_details": [ { "output_type": 9, "address": "bc1p9n5spsv7wj4l9ddmur86l3uxrvsfu9a3vl8x8mcdth46rxc6tk5sklcs75", "pk_script": "51202ce900c19e74abf2b5bbe0cfafc7861b209e17b167ce63ef0d5deba19b1a5da9", "amount": 5007553, "is_our_address": true } ], "raw_tx_hex": "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", "label": "0:sweep", "previous_outpoints": [ { "outpoint": "8b65fc87db7bd6f23756944261769352739f791495df0a23c877315ec4b1e3f4:0" }, { "outpoint": "1be0bceb5e8cc1eee34e840eb4739ba099fa16d8bc4bdd7d40e2cde208975677:0", "is_our_output": true } ] },

bitromortac commented 1 year ago

The sweep you posted is another instance of a foreign anchor sweep interfering with the internal sweep (see this outpoint https://mempool.space/tx/8b65fc87db7bd6f23756944261769352739f791495df0a23c877315ec4b1e3f4#vout=0). The external sweep is still unconfirmed (https://mempool.space/tx/443bdac052fc92b94137c3cb0dbb140cded7acb7cc307348feff84fb42d6f428).

MichaelAntonFischer commented 11 months ago

Hi,

looks like the transaction was never confirmed and is gone from the mempool. Is there anyway to trigger LND to do the sweep again?

ascisco commented 6 months ago

I am having the same issue

Hi,

looks like the transaction was never confirmed and is gone from the mempool. Is there anyway to trigger LND to do the sweep again?

Opago-Pay commented 6 months ago

I used an online tool to rebroadcast and fee bump the transaction.

bitromortac commented 6 months ago

I am having the same issue

Hi, looks like the transaction was never confirmed and is gone from the mempool. Is there anyway to trigger LND to do the sweep again?

Do you have pending channels? Could you show the outputs of interest?

lightningnetwork / lnd