lightningnetwork / lnd

Lightning Network Daemon ⚡️
MIT License
7.65k stars 2.07k forks source link

contractcourt+sweep: fix fee function and deadline issue #8751

Closed yyforyongyu closed 4 months ago

yyforyongyu commented 4 months ago

Fixes #8741 Fixes #8738

TODO:

coderabbitai[bot] commented 4 months ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Auto Review Skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
yyforyongyu commented 4 months ago

@morehouse Yeah the itest failure is annoying, don't think it can be properly fixed until blockbeat is in. Here's some logs which show that the subsystems have very different views of block heights,

2024-05-18 04:24:15.394 [DBG] SWPR: Received new block: height=476, attempt sweeping 0 inputs
...
2024-05-18 04:24:15.418 [INF] CNCT: *contractcourt.htlcSuccessResolver(ee04c77ad329073b6b7e1899e0173aa6c1835727f647b0853099fc7dcc6e0d2b): offering second-level success tx output to sweeper with no deadline and budget=0.00050000 BTC at height=471
...
2024-05-18 04:24:15.418 [INF] SWPR: Sweep request received: out_point=e0749b9458c5f6693eb79b6a6293feb44435467b2a68680185921f0d86425805:0, witness_type=HtlcAcceptedSuccessSecondLevel, relative_time_lock=4, absolute_time_lock=0, amount=0.00100000 BTC, parent=(<nil>), params=(startingFeeRate={false 0}, immediate=false, exclusive_group=none, budget=0.00050000 BTC, deadline=none)
2024-05-18 04:24:15.418 [INF] CNCT: *contractcourt.htlcSuccessResolver(ee04c77ad329073b6b7e1899e0173aa6c1835727f647b0853099fc7dcc6e0d2b): waiting for second-level HTLC output to be spent after csv_delay=4
...
2024-05-18 04:24:15.418 [DBG] SWPR: TxPublisher received new block: 471

As for now, I did an extra check in the test to make it pass. More work to do in 18.1, as I wanna fix these multi-hop tests so it's easier to maintain in the future.