lightningnetwork / lnd

Lightning Network Daemon ⚡️
MIT License
7.72k stars 2.09k forks source link

Start Channel Arbitrators concurrently #9262

Closed ziggie1984 closed 6 days ago

ziggie1984 commented 1 week ago

Followup of https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/9253. This makes sure we start the channel arbitrators concurrently with a maximum timeout of 5 min.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 week ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

:label: Labels to auto review (1) * llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
ziggie1984 commented 1 week ago

Ok I think this approach is not really good because you were raising a really good point here @guggero:

go func(arb *ChannelArbitrator) {
            defer wgChannelArb.Done()

            select {
            case channelArbErrs <- arb.Start(startState):

            case <-ctx.Done():
                channelArbErrs <- ctx.Err()

            case <-c.quit:
                channelArbErrs <- ErrChainArbExiting
            }
        }(arbitrator)

This call does block forever when we launch the arb.Start prior timeout, which we very likely will, the starting is not the problem but more the finishing. Tho looking into the start() function I don't really see an easy way to spawn goroutines which could cancel because of a timeout. I think what we should garantee is, that the call to the external units should be timing out if the call blocks. So I think this change makes no real sense.

ziggie1984 commented 1 week ago

By easy way, I don't think it is appropriate design, cancels imo make only sense if we know we spawn goroutines in that function but our problem arises because a function call to a normal subsystem does not timeout, so I think we need to improve there.

ziggie1984 commented 1 week ago

what we could do which is the only way it could work is something like this:

      // Create a new goroutine for the actual Start call
        startErrChan := make(chan error, 1)
        go func() {
            startErrChan <- arb.Start(startState)
        }()

        // Wait for either the start to complete or context to be done
        select {
        case err := <-startErrChan:
            channelArbErrs <- err

        case <-ctx.Done():
            // Don't wait for Start to complete if timeout occurs
            channelArbErrs <- ctx.Err()

        case <-c.quit:
            channelArbErrs <- ErrChainArbExiting

basically starting a goroutine in a goroutine. Only then can we really abort after the timeout.

ziggie1984 commented 1 week ago

Ok I mean spawning goroutines might not be the best solution here because we need for each startup 2, but I implemented it nonetheless because maybe it will take a while until we have the hooks for external subsystems configurable with timeouts.

ziggie1984 commented 1 week ago

@Roasbeef this works as well and resolves the deadlock.

ziggie1984 commented 6 days ago

closing in favour of https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/9253