Closed zhangliutong closed 5 months ago
Yes, I followed this setting.
On Thu, 7 May 2020 at 11:23 AM, zhangliutong notifications@github.com wrote:
I wonder if you follow the FAIM to use the label_list_25 to calculate the dice, and then fuse that into 5 regions to get the final result.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/liulihao-cuhk/Probabilistic-Multilayer-Regularization-Network/issues/1, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AESZCO4Z3GBCHGTMVI234IDRQKDZPANCNFSM4M3GKNLA .
I am confused that why not first fuse the regions into 5 ROIs, and then calculate the ROI dice.
Actually, you can.
Since in the training process you didn’t use any segmentation mask, you can also use the fuse-first segmentation mask for evaluation as long as you compare with other methods on this kind of segmentation mask.
On 7 May 2020, at 12:18 PM, zhangliutong notifications@github.com wrote:
I am confused that why not first fuse the regions into 5 ROIs, and then calculate the ROI dice.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/liulihao-cuhk/Probabilistic-Multilayer-Regularization-Network/issues/1#issuecomment-625192792, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AESZCO22OMSUITLHAYKQVFDRQKKKBANCNFSM4M3GKNLA.
Thank you so much. Do you use the mingboggle 101 in MNI152 space and LPB40 in delineation space?
I wonder if you follow the FAIM to use the label_list_25 to calculate the dice, and then fuse that into 5 regions to get the final result.