Open odanoburu opened 4 years ago
Yes, it seems we need to tune paragraph-separate
or paragraph-start
to make it behave correctly. I'll fix it soon. Thanks for reporting.
I tried this
◊; Local Variables:
◊; mode: pollen
◊; paragraph-start: "\\(◊;\\)\\|\\|[ ]*$"
◊; comment-start: "◊;"
◊; comment-start-skip: "◊;{?[[:space:]]*"
◊; End:
and the behaviour improved in some situations, but still doesn't work properly in all of them…
if I have a buffer with content like thus
when I invoke
fill-paragraph
(usually bound toM-q
), the result iswhereas I would expect the text not to change at all, see the same content in
org
syntax:after pressing
M-q
: