Incorrect format in use case extensions

[likeabowx]

This applies to almost all the use cases with extensions. The example given below is from the View use case.

For the extension 4a, it sounds like it should be listed as two different extensions 4a and 4b about checking index.

Also, for the step RecipeBook shows an error message, there should be a step number for it such as 4a1.

[nus-pe-script]

Team's Response

Hello Tester,

First of all, I'm tuning the severity you've given from a severity.medium to severity.veryLow because documentation bugs are only of low/medium severity if it is missing details or contains broken links. We will, however, accept this issue as a formatting issue.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue severity

Team chose [severity.VeryLow] Originally [severity.Medium]

• [x] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: This issue is more than just "purely comestic" as it is incorrect format for an use case, and it appears in almost all the use cases with extensions. It does cause occasional inconvenience for the reader as it disrupts the usual flow of reading a use case and the reader has to figure out what's happening.

---