Closed darwin closed 4 years ago
I'd like to have it one or another, rather than have people open up a codebase and figure out if they should use &
or :&
or be inconsistent (probably based on what editor the author uses).
Ok, don't worry. You may close this. I will probably keep a fork of helix with some custom patches on top, so it is not a big issue for me atm.
I'll keep this open as I think I want to move to a keyword version to not mess with Cursive users.
Yes, it would be great to use :&
instead of &
because currently I have joker warning for this symbol
&
is a special symbol acting as a spread operator in$
macro expansion.This causes minor issue in Cursive which sees a normal map and complains about unresolved symbol
&
. I think adding support for:&
to be optionally used in place of&
should not hurt anynone.See https://github.com/darwin/helix/commit/be5c3dc00790f60de5e22bdbc1ea9250b8b1981b