Closed Antigen-1 closed 1 year ago
---------Results--------(Diff): KMinAvg Min Avg Max Stdev Cnt
C++98_omp (100%): 122.67 91.85 165.06 249.06 49.55 20
Python3_mp (100%): 129.55 126.64 133.99 148.15 5.80 20
Perl_parallel (100%): 149.99 139.08 159.26 188.84 12.08 20
C (100%): 226.60 225.65 235.99 266.48 12.20 20
C++17 (100%): 250.78 245.57 259.77 289.74 11.94 20
C++98 (100%): 253.36 243.69 264.88 303.93 15.54 20
C++14 (100%): 274.97 247.43 289.88 318.10 20.84 20
C++11 ( 91%): 292.06 281.73 305.70 352.84 18.76 20
Python3 (100%): 307.46 294.74 318.53 353.81 15.58 20
Python3_bytes (100%): 451.67 432.32 465.72 511.27 18.68 20
Perl (100%): 489.80 477.19 504.51 528.39 16.27 20
ChezScheme (100%): 589.48 574.64 602.43 631.11 16.47 20
Racket_parallel (100%): 600.13 585.40 615.93 661.65 20.08 20
Racket_compiled (100%): 800.14 796.38 804.47 823.18 6.15 20
Racket (100%): 804.91 802.47 816.74 848.46 16.07 20
POSIX_dash ( 95%): 967.83 955.56 974.41 993.36 8.68 20
POSIX_bash ( 95%): 1175.02 1079.52 1271.85 1488.41 119.68 20
Bash_parallel ( 12%): 1268.55 1252.86 1299.80 1498.26 55.47 20
Tcl ( 95%): 1331.60 1303.81 1344.26 1383.34 18.02 20
Bash ( 87%): 1426.80 1403.58 1473.91 1718.02 74.65 20
------------Fails-------------------
More changes are submitted to avoid building unnecessary lists in the process of outputting.
I plan to add a Typed_racket
version, which is written in typed racket, a sister language of racket with a static type-checker. The performance, though, is even worse than the Racket_compiled
version. The reason appears to lie in the absence of standard libraries, with typed/racket
providing all bindings I need. Could you please give it a shot?
Avoid building the intermediate list.