search

limacv / Deblur-NeRF

MIT License
263 stars 28 forks source link

PSNR is not the same #21

Open 520jz opened 1 year ago

520jz commented 1 year ago

Hello, really thank you very much for checking out my question in your busy schedule. In the paper, the PSNR of the BlurFactor dataset is 25.60, but the PSNR I got when I trained with the BlurFactor dataset turned out to be 36, why is it lower in the paper? Is it a problem with my training?

520jz commented 1 year ago

The config file I use is tx_blurfactory_full.txt

520jz commented 1 year ago

The command is：python3 run_nerf.py --config configs/blurfactory/tx_blurfactory_full.txt

limacv commented 1 year ago

You may want to check on this link (https://github.com/limacv/Deblur-NeRF/issues/6#issue-1301430857), which is caused by me mistakenly leaving one config on when doing the evaluation. But I'm not pretty sure if this is the actual reason for such a significant difference in your case. Another possible reason is the randomness. As I find in my experiment that using different random seeds may lead to different metric values.

520jz commented 1 year ago

You may want to check on this link (#6 (comment)), which is caused by me mistakenly leaving one config on when doing the evaluation. But I'm not pretty sure if this is the actual reason for such a significant difference in your case. Another possible reason is the randomness. As I find in my experiment that using different random seeds may lead to different metric values.

Ok, really appreciate your answer.