Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Doug,
Could you update the ChromeDevTools just in case, and retry? The latest
ChromeDevTools build id is 0.1.0.200907271854, and nobody seems to have
reported
similar problems so far.
Apart from that, the Google Chrome version 2.0.172.39 is not compatible with
the
SDK/debugger. As per http://code.google.com/p/chromedevtools/, you must be
running at
least 3.0.189.0 for the SDK/debugger to function.
Original comment by apav...@chromium.org
on 17 Aug 2009 at 12:57
Hi Doug
Could you please specify version of your Java SDK.
Thanks,
Peter
Original comment by peter.ry...@gmail.com
on 17 Aug 2009 at 3:49
I was already using the latest ChromeDevTools, but I hadn't got the right
version of Chrome so I installed the latest 3.x version. I haven't had much
time to test it, but
I no longer get an exception and I do have the project created when debugging,
so I'm
assuming its all OK.
BTW - I'm a WTP committer at Eclipse.org, which is something I do in my spare
time,
having developed an XSLT launcher and debugger for Xalan, an XPath view etc.
(see the
new XML perspective in Eclipse JEE Galileo). Do you guys need an extra pair of
hands
on this project? I can maybe offer some help.
The JDK version was 1.6.0_13.
Thanks,
Doug
Original comment by doug.sat...@ymail.com
on 18 Aug 2009 at 7:48
Hi Doug,
An extra pair of hands would be great. We don't have committer policy
established
yet, but it most likely is going to be Chromium-alike. (We are all chromium
committers). So we welcome patches and after some time take committers aboard.
What are you interested in doing? Here is what I can think of: we'd like to play
nicely with WTP. This includes re-using WTP viewers/editors for JavaScript and
XML,
matching scripts fetched from the browser with the actual resources in the
workspace,
setting breakpoints on these resources, editing them live, refreshing the
browser and
seeing them being hit.
Thanks
Pavel
Original comment by pfeld...@chromium.org
on 20 Aug 2009 at 6:12
Hi Pavel - I can definitely help with WTP integration, as a large part of the
XSL
Tools project was to figure out how best to leverage the existing WTP code
base. Do
you have a page somewhere where you keep your planned items such as those you
mentioned?
From my point of view, I would like to see scripts from the browser match to
existing
resources in the workspace. I don't know how much you've thought about this,
but one
potential way to do it would be to create files that are linked to resources in
the
filesystem. This works just like a symlink on Unix. For example, right-click on
a
project and select New -> File, and in that dialog expand the Advanced toggle.
In
there, you can specify the location of a resource anywhere in the filesystem,
including another file in the workspace. There may be some work in
synchronizing
resource markers (such as breakpoints) between the real and symlinked file
though.
This is a possible piece of functionality I could take a look at to start with?
Thanks,
Doug
Original comment by doug.sat...@ymail.com
on 20 Aug 2009 at 8:39
Hi Doug,
Sorry for not getting back to you for so long. This sounds great - we
definitely want
to match to existing resources and WTP sounds like a project that we could
leverage a
lot from.
We did not think much about it, so suggestions are welcome. It could be a
lightweight
mapping where one could navigate from script list into the workspace and set
breakpoints there. So that no markers copying was necessary.
We were thinking of tracking features via issues tracker, it is just that it is
not
yet populated. I think Peter and Alexander are working on it.
Thanks
Pavel
Original comment by pfeld...@chromium.org
on 25 Aug 2009 at 2:34
A bad Google Chrome version was used. Closing.
Doug, we'll contact you once we get to the new features. Meanwhile, you can
examine the
latest code changes in the trunk and consider plugging in the WTP JavaScript
editor if
one is available in the Eclipse platform instance.
Original comment by apav...@chromium.org
on 11 Sep 2009 at 1:18
Ok - I've got the source and have had a look through. I've got a lot of other
bits and
pieces to finish up on other projects at the moment, but hopefully will find
time to
work on this soon as it looks like an interesting project.
Original comment by doug.sat...@ymail.com
on 11 Sep 2009 at 1:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
doug.sat...@ymail.com
on 13 Aug 2009 at 9:34