Open MathieuDutSik opened 3 months ago
The use of RocksDb for the wallet forces compiling with RocksDb which is bad for the CI.
The following are done:
RocksDb
storage_service
{path}_cliend_{id}.db
The CI is the goal here.
Not relevant.
Maybe the default storage should still be RocksDB (if it's compiled in)? Other than in tests, I imagine we always want RocksDB?
Motivation
The use of RocksDb for the wallet forces compiling with RocksDb which is bad for the CI.
Proposal
The following are done:
RocksDb
tostorage_service
.{path}_cliend_{id}.db
which is maybe not a nice table name. But it works here.Test Plan
The CI is the goal here.
Release Plan
Not relevant.
Links