search

linette-g / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Blocking of duplicate name seems too strict #7

Open linette-g opened 1 week ago

linette-g commented 1 week ago

Given the context of managing potential hires and employees, it is highly possible that they could have the same name. The system currently blocks the adding of an employee with the same name (even though the rest of the fields are different) and displays a warning This person already exists in the address book. This could have been handled with warnings, such as duplicate entry alerts. This blocking behaviour can disrupt workflow unnecessarily when duplicates might be intentional (e.g., multiple employees with the same name). The current implementation makes adding those with the same name impossible.

Screenshot 2024-11-15 at 5.38.52 PM.png

soc-pe-bot commented 6 days ago

[IMPORTANT!: Please do not edit or reply to this comment using the GitHub UI. You can respond to it using CATcher during the next phase of the PE]

Team's Response

image.png

Mentioned in planned enhancement.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your reason]