I know that supporting FacT++ has historically been a pain. We've found JFACT
to be easier to get working consistently with the OWL-API. This performs
better than HermiT does with our ontologies, so would be great if you could
integrate it into the list of available reasoners.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by dosu...@gmail.com on 8 Feb 2013 at 4:24
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dosu...@gmail.com
on 8 Feb 2013 at 4:24