Closed wcarthur closed 1 month ago
Hi Craig,
Great question!
(In my opinion) The short answer is that this the relative roles of Cd and Ck in the intensification rate equation are still under debate. See this paper for a recent theory on the drag coefficient being important (as opposed to the surface enthalpy coefficient, as in Emanuel and Rotunno (2012)).
For your purposes, Ck and Cd (in those equations) are interchangeable, and I would, as you say, just change "Ck" in those equations to be the surface drag coefficient. This would be valuable if you wanted to, say, increase Cd over land.
Jonathan
Thanks, just wanted to be clear that I wasn't getting it the wrong way around. I've made a change to the surface drag coefficient (same as Hamish Ramsay did) to improve the overland decay rates
Curious to know if the variable
Ck
is actually representing the surface drag coefficient inCoupled_FAST.py
. It's labeled as enthalpy when the class is instantiated, but later on this variable is used like it's the drag coefficient (e.g. see line 149).Cd
is used correctly in calculating CAPE (and hence the potential intensity).Labeled as surface enthalpy:
This is Eq (3) from Emanuel (2017). Here
self.Ck
is used asCd
I presume if I wanted to modify the surface drag coefficient, then
Ck
is the variable in the code to modify?