johngallo
commented
4 years ago Yes, that would be another great addition to the log file. It would also be nice to know the GB of RAMand maybe even the processor. And the OS. And the version of Arc. But is any or all of that an invasion of privacy? Arguably no, since we do not need to share our log files. Thanks Darren!
John Gallo, Ph.D. Senior Scientist Conservation Biology Institute https://consbio.org/people/staff/john-gallo 136 SW Washington Avenue, Suite 202 Corvallis, OR 97333 Remote Office: Inglenook, CA Phone: 707.962.9078 Twitter: @johnagallo https://twitter.com/johnagallo Updates: Action Research Newsletter https://consbio.us9.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=3dea159e4cbe0a0ff3b43eadd&id=e3bd82fd81
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 5:07 PM Darren Kavanagh notifications@github.com wrote:
Updating logging to provide more information could help identify problems more efficiently. For example, we could report coordinate systems for inputs, number of cores, cell units, no of cells, etc. The current logging system reports a lot of processing info, some of which is not useful after the model run has completed.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/linkagescape/linkage-mapper/issues/102, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD7CJ25QQVPTVJXIXXRZEJTROTEDDANCNFSM4MRO6CCA .
Updating logging to provide more information could help identify problems more efficiently. For example, we could report coordinate systems for inputs, number of cores, cell units, no of cells, ArcGIS version, etc. The current logging system reports a lot of processing info, some of which is not useful after the model run has completed.