Closed ghost closed 8 years ago
Hi Paul
Thanks for noticing that, I will push the correction in the next few days.
Franck
Hi Frank,
I still do not see the correction.
Paul
Is it that difficult??
No, It's not difficult. A change which can be made in 5 minutes by the editor.
Paul
On 26 Jan 2016, at 18:55, Yang notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
Is it that difficult??
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/linked-statistics/xkos/issues/27#issuecomment-175113986.
Fixed in commit 61f5f6d, I hope I have got it right this time. Sorry it took so long.
Will have a look shortly.
Paul
From: Franck Cotton notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> Reply-To: linked-statistics/xkos reply@reply.github.com<mailto:reply@reply.github.com> Date: Tuesday 15 March 2016 at 11:44 To: linked-statistics/xkos xkos@noreply.github.com<mailto:xkos@noreply.github.com> Cc: Paul Hermans paul@proxml.be<mailto:paul@proxml.be> Subject: Re: [xkos] incorrect mapping to skos (#27)
Fixed in commit 61f5f6dhttps://github.com/linked-statistics/xkos/commit/61f5f6dff3fec8620be0f0fd1bea42ab29b2992c, I hope I have got it right this time. Sorry it took so long.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/linked-statistics/xkos/issues/27#issuecomment-196761804
I'm afraid some parts of XKOS are not correctly mapped to SKOS.
E.g. xkos:hasPart is a sub-type of skos:broader xkos:isPartOf is a sub-type of skos:narrower If I say :x xkos:hasPart :y, then I am saying that :x is bigger/broader/containing :y. Following your specification, I'm saying then also :x skos:broader :y, which semantics are :x has broader :y. Which is precisely the opposite of what has been previously said.
Figure 9 shows it correctly where hasPart is mapped to narrower.
But http://rdf-vocabulary.ddialliance.org/xkos.rdf also contains the error.