Closed catecara closed 5 years ago
Furthermore skos:related is a symmetric property so the given refinements contradict the SKOS specification. I suppose the refinements should be non-symmetric alternatives to skos:related instead.
A subProperty of a symmetric property is not necessarily symmetric. The paragraph of the SKOS specification being referred to makes this explicit :
Note that, although skos:related is a symmetric property, this condition does not place any restrictions on sub-properties of skos:related (i.e., sub-properties of skos:related could be symmetric, not symmetric or antisymmetric, and still be consistent with the SKOS data model).
The rationale of the subProperties of skos:related is stated in the introduction; they are directly derived from ISO standards on classifications :
The proposed extensions to SKOS were not only guided by the needs of the statistical community but by requirements laid out in ISO standards on terminology, such as ISO 704:2009 ([ISO704]) and ISO 1087-1:2000 ([ISO1087]). These standards describe and define the constructs and relations necessary for concept management and a more complete description of statistical classifications.
Another reference to these ISO standards will be inserted in Section 9 to make this explicit.
The refinement of skos:related is clearly allowed by SKOS. As a matter of fact, the causal relation is precisely an example of extension given by SKOS itself in Example 31.
<cause> rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:related .
<effect> rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:related ;
owl:inverseOf <cause> .
<A> <cause> <B> .
This addresses use-cases (often met) of "I want to stay in the SKOS/terminology world but I want to take one small step in introducing more semantics without migrating everything in OWL".
In Sec 9, a few refinements to skos:related are introduced, namely xkos:caused (xkos:cuasedBy) and xkos:precedes (xkos:succeeds) (and xkos:previous, xkos:next).
The rationale and intended meaning/use of these properties is not stated. Also, such properties bring XKOS outside the scope of an RDF/SKOS extension and would rather require logical axioms. Discussion related to issue https://github.com/linked-statistics/xkos/issues/76