Closed FranckCo closed 11 years ago
ConceptAssociationCollection could be renamed Concordance (this should be validated by checking the Neuchâtel model). The property linking Concordance and ConceptAssociation would then be named 'madeOf'.
Done in Dagstuhl: we keep Correspondence and introduce madeOf.
Should we define a new property for the aggregation of concept associations in concept associations collections (hasMember in the UML model), or should we use skos:member ? The latter would probably necessitate to make ConceptAssociation a subclass of Concept and ConceptAssociationCollection a subclass of skos:Collection.