Open matentzn opened 1 year ago
I think I found the source of the problem:
While this works in generalize-tsv
, generalize-tsvs
flakes out if you provide an empty table.
What's the preferred behavior here:
I favor 1 as default, with an option to do 2
I can't think of a scenario where 3 is desired for generalization
I agree with your preference. I do think 1 default and 3 is also an option if the table has columns, since you can add slots with string range for these?
I will reopen this for some tiny reason:
(Close immediately if it does)
Thanks for reopening. I agree with your assessment, we can still make a class if column headers are present
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 8:33 AM Nico Matentzoglu @.***> wrote:
I will reopen this for some tiny reason:
- What if the table has columns, but no rows? Does your judgement above still hold?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/linkml/schema-automator/issues/99#issuecomment-1321176312, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOOVCGIYMECQMPFOPD3WJJHFPANCNFSM6AAAAAAQ257HLI . You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: @.***>
In a fresh (empty) virtual environment am trying:
Strangely some dependency conflict precludes installation of 1.3.5 linkml.
Now when I run (see here):
I am able to run
generalize-tsv
on a smaller dataset w/o problems. Any idea what could be wrong?