What happened:
In one lab from where I'm taking systems from time to time they provide RHEL8 systems with firewalld.service masked by default. Running firewall role on them fails.
Maybe this is not a bug report, maybe it is not even a feature request, but still I though I report it as capability to deal with this might add another bit of resiliency.
# systemctl status firewalld
● firewalld.service
Loaded: masked (Reason: Unit firewalld.service is masked.)
Active: inactive (dead)
What you expected to happen:
Given firewall role decided to use firewalld as a provider, it should be able to handle this situation.
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
I think having this:
What happened: In one lab from where I'm taking systems from time to time they provide RHEL8 systems with firewalld.service masked by default. Running firewall role on them fails.
Maybe this is not a bug report, maybe it is not even a feature request, but still I though I report it as capability to deal with this might add another bit of resiliency.
What you expected to happen: Given firewall role decided to use firewalld as a provider, it should be able to handle this situation.
How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible): I think having this:
and firewalld masked and config like this:
Anything else we need to know?: N/A
Environment: