Open jstancek opened 2 years ago
Despite recent patch, this test is still failing sporadically on upstream kernels (x86_64 and aarch64). Maybe we need bigger reserve in terms of free memory?
1 <<<test_start>>> 2 tag=set_mempolicy04 stime=1658259644 3 cmdline="set_mempolicy04" 4 contacts="" 5 analysis=exit 6 <<<test_output>>> 7 tst_device.c:89: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0' 8 tst_test.c:1526: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s 9 tst_supported_fs_types.c:88: TINFO: Kernel supports ext2 10 tst_supported_fs_types.c:50: TINFO: mkfs.ext2 does exist 11 tst_supported_fs_types.c:88: TINFO: Kernel supports ext3 12 tst_supported_fs_types.c:50: TINFO: mkfs.ext3 does exist 13 tst_supported_fs_types.c:88: TINFO: Kernel supports ext4 14 tst_supported_fs_types.c:50: TINFO: mkfs.ext4 does exist 15 tst_supported_fs_types.c:88: TINFO: Kernel supports xfs 16 tst_supported_fs_types.c:50: TINFO: mkfs.xfs does exist 17 tst_supported_fs_types.c:88: TINFO: Kernel supports vfat 18 tst_supported_fs_types.c:50: TINFO: mkfs.vfat does exist 19 tst_supported_fs_types.c:88: TINFO: Kernel supports exfat 20 tst_supported_fs_types.c:46: TINFO: mkfs.exfat does not exist 21 tst_supported_fs_types.c:118: TINFO: FUSE does support ntfs 22 tst_supported_fs_types.c:50: TINFO: mkfs.ntfs does exist 23 tst_supported_fs_types.c:88: TINFO: Kernel supports tmpfs 24 tst_supported_fs_types.c:37: TINFO: mkfs is not needed for tmpfs 25 tst_test.c:1599: TINFO: Testing on ext2 26 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 4 NUMA memory nodes 27 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE) 28 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 614, expected <536.67,613.33> 29 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 1 allocated 575 <536.67,613.33> 30 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 2 allocated 552 <536.67,613.33> 31 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 3 allocated 559 <536.67,613.33> 32 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (2300) 33 tst_test.c:1599: TINFO: Testing on ext3 34 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 4 NUMA memory nodes 35 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE) 36 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 614, expected <536.67,613.33> 37 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 1 allocated 575 <536.67,613.33> 38 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 2 allocated 552 <536.67,613.33> 39 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 3 allocated 559 <536.67,613.33> 40 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (2300) 41 tst_test.c:1599: TINFO: Testing on ext4 42 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 4 NUMA memory nodes 43 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE) 44 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 614, expected <536.67,613.33> 45 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 1 allocated 575 <536.67,613.33> 46 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 2 allocated 552 <536.67,613.33> 47 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 3 allocated 559 <536.67,613.33> 48 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (2300) 49 tst_test.c:1599: TINFO: Testing on xfs 50 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 4 NUMA memory nodes 51 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE) 52 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 614, expected <536.67,613.33> 53 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 1 allocated 575 <536.67,613.33> 54 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 2 allocated 552 <536.67,613.33> 55 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 3 allocated 559 <536.67,613.33> 56 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (2300) 57 tst_test.c:1599: TINFO: Testing on vfat 58 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 4 NUMA memory nodes 59 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE) 60 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 614, expected <536.67,613.33> 61 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 1 allocated 575 <536.67,613.33> 62 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 2 allocated 552 <536.67,613.33> 63 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 3 allocated 559 <536.67,613.33> 64 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (2300) 65 tst_test.c:1599: TINFO: Testing on ntfs 66 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 4 NUMA memory nodes 67 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE) 68 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 614, expected <536.67,613.33> 69 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 1 allocated 575 <536.67,613.33> 70 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 2 allocated 552 <536.67,613.33> 71 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 3 allocated 559 <536.67,613.33> 72 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (2300) 73 tst_test.c:1599: TINFO: Testing on tmpfs 74 tst_numa.c:200: TINFO: Found 4 NUMA memory nodes 75 set_mempolicy04.c:121: TPASS: set_mempolicy(MPOL_INTERLEAVE) 76 set_mempolicy04.c:88: TFAIL: Node 0 allocated 614, expected <536.67,613.33> 77 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 1 allocated 575 <536.67,613.33> 78 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 2 allocated 552 <536.67,613.33> 79 set_mempolicy04.c:85: TPASS: Node 3 allocated 559 <536.67,613.33> 80 set_mempolicy04.c:101: TPASS: Sum of nodes equals to allocated pages (2300) 81 82 Summary: 83 passed 35 84 failed 7 85 broken 0 86 skipped 0 87 warnings 0 88 <<<execution_status>>> 89 initiation_status="ok" 90 duration=1 termination_type=exited termination_id=1 corefile=no 91 cutime=5 cstime=29 92 <<<test_end>>>
Despite recent patch, this test is still failing sporadically on upstream kernels (x86_64 and aarch64). Maybe we need bigger reserve in terms of free memory?