Closed nicobo closed 2 years ago
I do not get your point, but maybe following helps you:
Yes, digikam is a desktop app, the purpose of this image is to run it inside an remote desktop which you can access via browser anywhere. Just make the app fullscreen and it is a really nice experience except video (see #9).
OK so it's more a way to have it installed in a "standard" docker way on a remote desktop. Maybe useful when the disk containing photos is attached to this distant machine...
Thanks, I didn't get it at first because I'm more used to headless images. Still that may need a bit of an introduction in the readme.
It is a headless image. It makes digikam interface available via a web browser as described in the readme.
It doesn't have to be on a "distant" machine.
@aptalca of course it doesn't have to be distant, but then what's the use of accessing it via a web browser since you have local access to the machine and a display, obviously ? I thought I got it with @AlmightyFrog answer but your comment makes me wonder...?
I don't want to troll I'm just curious...
The same arguments for why people run apps in containers instead of installing stuff on bare metal also apply here.
Hi
This is very interesting to have digikam on docker, but AFAIK its a desktop app and the doc says it's as available on localhost:3000? The doc should explain how it works and what this image delivers regarding the desktop app digikam.