Error: Access violation

Razva commented 3 years ago

Expected Behavior

Guacamole -> DoubleCommander should work as expected, with no errors showing on access.

Current Behavior

When accessing DoubleCommander we're greeted with an error stating Error: Access violation. Here's a screenshot: https://www.screencast.com/t/8JxlCLXs

Steps to Reproduce

Start DoubleCommander via CLI or via Docker-Compose. Access the app via browser.

Environment

OS: Debian 10 CPU architecture: arm64 How docker service was installed: From the distro's repo. Device: Odroid HC4 Extra OS info:

Linux version 5.11.0-odroid-arm64 (gcc-8 (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.31.1) SMP PREEMPT Debian 5.11.18-202108050550~buster (2021-08-04)
Docker version 18.09.1, build 4c52b90

Command used to create docker container (run/create/compose/screenshot)

Using docker-compose.yml:

version: "2.1"
services:
  doublecommander:
    image: ghcr.io/linuxserver/doublecommander
    container_name: doublecommander
    environment:
      - PUID=1000
      - PGID=1000
      - TZ=Europe/Bucharest
    volumes:
      - /home/razvanr/doublecommander:/config
      - /home/razvanr:/data
    ports:
      - 8086:3000
    restart: unless-stopped

Docker logs

Logfile here: http://sprunge.us/Rcye2Z

Permissions

# ls -la /home/razvanr/
drwxr-xr-x 8 razvanr razvanr 4096 Aug 13 17:20 doublecommander

# ls -la /home/razvanr/doublecommander/
total 56
drwxr-xr-x 8 razvanr razvanr  4096 Aug 13 17:20 .
drwxr-xr-x 5 razvanr razvanr  4096 Aug 13 17:19 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 razvanr razvanr  2408 Aug 13 17:19 .bashrc
drwxrwxr-x 3 razvanr razvanr  4096 Aug 13 17:20 .cache
drwxr-xr-x 5 razvanr razvanr  4096 Aug 13 17:20 .config
drwx------ 3 razvanr razvanr  4096 Aug 13 17:20 .dbus
drwx------ 3 razvanr razvanr  4096 Aug 13 17:20 .local
-rw-r--r-- 1 razvanr razvanr 13347 Aug 13 17:20 .xorgxrdp.10.log
drwxr-xr-x 2 root    root     4096 Aug 13 17:19 custom-cont-init.d
drwxr-xr-x 2 root    root     4096 Aug 13 17:19 custom-services.d
-rwxr-xr-x 1 razvanr razvanr    82 Aug 13 17:19 startwm.sh

github-actions[bot] commented 3 years ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

mrp-yt commented 2 years ago

Same here. Different setup with same docker image

Linux galaxy 5.10.63-v8+ #1457 SMP PREEMPT Tue Sep 28 11:27:02 BST 2021 aarch64 GNU/Linux RPi4 8GM Ram DietPi OS

github-actions[bot] commented 2 years ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

spewu commented 2 years ago

Looks like it should be fixed in v. 0.8.4: https://doublecmd.sourceforge.io/mantisbt/view.php?id=2126

So hope linuxserver will update the docker image :)

aptalca commented 2 years ago

Our updates are automated. When there is a new version in the repo, we'll push out a new build

spewu commented 2 years ago

Our updates are automated. When there is a new version in the repo, we'll push out a new build

Ahh, nice!

So, I might be missing something, but it looks like they released v. 1.0.2 3 days ago, and have done many newer releases than v. 0.8.2 that is in this image. So is there some problem in the way you detect new versions?

https://sourceforge.net/p/doublecmd/wiki/Download/

aptalca commented 2 years ago

We install from the ubuntu repo: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-doublecommander/blob/master/Dockerfile#L14

spewu commented 2 years ago

We install from the ubuntu repo: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-doublecommander/blob/master/Dockerfile#L14

Ok, so I guess it should be v. 0.9.10: https://packages.ubuntu.com/impish/doublecmd-gtk ?

I just installed the latest linuxserver docker image, and I get v. 0.8.2:

spewu commented 2 years ago

Ahh ... it is probably because it is on ubuntu bionic: https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/doublecmd-gtk

aptalca commented 2 years ago

right, we can update to focal, which will go up a little further but it will still be behind the latest

spewu commented 2 years ago

right, we can update to focal, which will go up a little further but it will still be behind the latest

I think this exact bug was fixed in 0.8.4 - and focal will give us 0.9.8 ... so that should be enough 🤞

spewu commented 2 years ago

@aptalca thanks a lot!

mrp-yt commented 2 years ago

I can confirm too. Working perfectly withy setup.

linuxserver / docker-doublecommander