Open DeflateAwning opened 11 months ago
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR: https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r2-pkg-2522ae29-dev-b987292e3185fcfbe1a6822d5ebd25424839bc3b-pr-159/index.html https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r2-pkg-2522ae29-dev-b987292e3185fcfbe1a6822d5ebd25424839bc3b-pr-159/shellcheck-result.xml | Tag | Passed |
---|---|---|
amd64-2.8.2-r2-pkg-2522ae29-dev-b987292e3185fcfbe1a6822d5ebd25424839bc3b-pr-159 | ✅ | |
arm64v8-2.8.2-r2-pkg-2522ae29-dev-b987292e3185fcfbe1a6822d5ebd25424839bc3b-pr-159 | ❌ |
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Please merge this PR, or suggest why it is not merged
Please merge this PR, or suggest why it is not merged
it's not merged because you're the only user to ever request it, we have a backlog, we do this in our free time, and you aren't special. wait patiently.
You will need to find a user with a fully proper setup (where ipv6 isn't disabled on the host/network) to test your changes. This change should not be necessary, generally speaking, for normal users. Once this is validated to NOT cause issues for other users, we can merge.
I'd suggest that the fact that it caused issues on my setup where there was only partial IPv6 support is enough to warrant hardcoding the fix.
Users who want to use ipv6 have their own probe for that purpose.
it's not merged because you're the only user to ever request it, we have a backlog, we do this in our free time, and you aren't special. wait patiently.
Git bot makes me post these comments. I was waiting patiently until it said my issue would be closed automatically and accused me of inactivity.
Git bot makes me post these comments. I was waiting patiently until it said my issue would be closed automatically and accused me of inactivity.
got it, i've marked it wip, the bot will no longer bother you, but it won't get merged until it's tested by the intended audience.
Might I suggest creating a new probe type called FPing4
and setting the protocol version on that? This could be added to the container documentation so that users who want to force IPv4-only probes can do so, without affecting the majority of existing users.
I like that quite a bit actually, good point! Very forwards-compatible. Will work on making an FPing4
probe
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR: https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r3-pkg-34ec03a8-dev-e9331e7a5b7ee54f7b3f566fee5e5eea1b7f179c-pr-159/index.html https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r3-pkg-34ec03a8-dev-e9331e7a5b7ee54f7b3f566fee5e5eea1b7f179c-pr-159/shellcheck-result.xml | Tag | Passed |
---|---|---|
amd64-2.8.2-r3-pkg-34ec03a8-dev-e9331e7a5b7ee54f7b3f566fee5e5eea1b7f179c-pr-159 | ✅ | |
arm64v8-2.8.2-r3-pkg-34ec03a8-dev-e9331e7a5b7ee54f7b3f566fee5e5eea1b7f179c-pr-159 | ❌ |
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR: https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r3-pkg-79df53a3-dev-1760b88e1d66922ebe4f80e85d91ce2b4e8e9531-pr-159/index.html https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r3-pkg-79df53a3-dev-1760b88e1d66922ebe4f80e85d91ce2b4e8e9531-pr-159/shellcheck-result.xml | Tag | Passed |
---|---|---|
amd64-2.8.2-r3-pkg-79df53a3-dev-1760b88e1d66922ebe4f80e85d91ce2b4e8e9531-pr-159 | ✅ | |
arm64v8-2.8.2-r3-pkg-79df53a3-dev-1760b88e1d66922ebe4f80e85d91ce2b4e8e9531-pr-159 | ❌ |
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR: https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r3-pkg-9ed8e115-dev-27de0223e01edbd58222e08e087e25ccd8c96346-pr-159/index.html https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r3-pkg-9ed8e115-dev-27de0223e01edbd58222e08e087e25ccd8c96346-pr-159/shellcheck-result.xml | Tag | Passed |
---|---|---|
amd64-2.8.2-r3-pkg-9ed8e115-dev-27de0223e01edbd58222e08e087e25ccd8c96346-pr-159 | ✅ | |
arm64v8-2.8.2-r3-pkg-9ed8e115-dev-27de0223e01edbd58222e08e087e25ccd8c96346-pr-159 | ❌ |
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR: https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r3-pkg-23e4e876-dev-cbc725ce0c2c2618a6ac07fa1e3b98ee24e3c1db-pr-159/index.html https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r3-pkg-23e4e876-dev-cbc725ce0c2c2618a6ac07fa1e3b98ee24e3c1db-pr-159/shellcheck-result.xml | Tag | Passed |
---|---|---|
amd64-2.8.2-r3-pkg-23e4e876-dev-cbc725ce0c2c2618a6ac07fa1e3b98ee24e3c1db-pr-159 | ✅ | |
arm64v8-2.8.2-r3-pkg-23e4e876-dev-cbc725ce0c2c2618a6ac07fa1e3b98ee24e3c1db-pr-159 | ❌ |
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR: https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r3-pkg-10015a3d-dev-1c9ab3fca0c8d9d77eff86a929549caa408fba22-pr-159/index.html https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r3-pkg-10015a3d-dev-1c9ab3fca0c8d9d77eff86a929549caa408fba22-pr-159/shellcheck-result.xml | Tag | Passed |
---|---|---|
amd64-2.8.2-r3-pkg-10015a3d-dev-1c9ab3fca0c8d9d77eff86a929549caa408fba22-pr-159 | ✅ | |
arm64v8-2.8.2-r3-pkg-10015a3d-dev-1c9ab3fca0c8d9d77eff86a929549caa408fba22-pr-159 | ❌ |
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR: https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r3-pkg-cf43a2e0-dev-083a865dc21f4eecee5750bdef32ffe416942b60-pr-159/index.html https://ci-tests.linuxserver.io/lspipepr/smokeping/2.8.2-r3-pkg-cf43a2e0-dev-083a865dc21f4eecee5750bdef32ffe416942b60-pr-159/shellcheck-result.xml | Tag | Passed |
---|---|---|
amd64-2.8.2-r3-pkg-cf43a2e0-dev-083a865dc21f4eecee5750bdef32ffe416942b60-pr-159 | ✅ | |
arm64v8-2.8.2-r3-pkg-cf43a2e0-dev-083a865dc21f4eecee5750bdef32ffe416942b60-pr-159 | ❌ |
Solves an issue related to DNS lookups failing on an IPv4 workstation
Description:
Hard-code IPv4 in the FPing probe
Benefits of this PR and context:
How Has This Been Tested?
Simple testing with default setup otherwise.
Source / References:
N/A