Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Looks like a GPU specific issue. The test passes with 22.0.1128.0 (Official
Build 148524) Canary with NVIDIA 301.42 drivers and a Quadro FX 380 on Windows
7 64-bit.
Original comment by kbr@chromium.org
on 26 Jul 2012 at 6:00
I know it passes on both AMD and NV on Win7. It's possible there is an ANGLE
bug in the non-9ex path which would only really be exercised on WinXP. Either
that, or it's a driver issue. One way to test would be to run the tests with
d3d9ex disabled on Windows 7.
Original comment by dan...@transgaming.com
on 26 Jul 2012 at 7:54
> Looks like a GPU specific issue
Specific to 2 GPUs from different makers? I don't think so. Furthermore one of
those on which it fails on Windows XP is a GeForce 9800GT with the NVIDIA
301.42 driver. I think, as I wrote in initial report, that this is an ANGLE bug
on Windows XP.
> Either that, or it's a driver issue.
What driver is common to both GPUs?
> I know it passes on ... AMD
You have to be careful making statements like that because AMD has 2 different
drivers with different version numbering schemes for the pro (workstation)
cards and the consumer (desktop) cards.
> One way to test would be to run the tests with d3d9ex disabled on Windows 7
How do I do that?
Original comment by goo...@erewhon0.net
on 27 Jul 2012 at 1:56
Yeah, Mark is correct.
I just build chromium with D3D9EX disabled and on my Win7 with AMD GPU,
texture-mips.html began to fail, whereas the test is passing with D3D9EX
enabled.
Original comment by z...@google.com
on 28 Jul 2012 at 12:41
I was able to reproduce this as well on Windows 7 with D3D9EX disabled. I'll
have a closer look at it...
Original comment by nicolas....@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2012 at 8:11
Original comment by nicolas....@gmail.com
on 24 Sep 2012 at 8:29
This is fixed in r1288. This issue was with managed textures which need to be
explicitly marked dirty when upper levels are modified.
Original comment by dan...@transgaming.com
on 27 Sep 2012 at 5:56
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
goo...@erewhon0.net
on 26 Jul 2012 at 4:13