Closed sbrandtb closed 1 year ago
Yes yes :-/ I so that, Thanks @sbrandtb
Now the question is what to do Create a special version for python 3.11 and up or create to versions of the same class in the same version to support all versions :scream:
Actually I think that it's good to remove the accessor layer but ...
I feel you will have to gate code with checks of sys.version_info >= (3, 11)
or something along the lines ...
It's probably also fine to start to dropping older versions. 3.6 is EOL and 3.7 is EOL in 6 months.
Release in Version 0.4.0
@liormizr thanks so much for all the updates! Does v0.4.0 close this issue with Python 3.11?
bandersnatch's CI confirms this works for it's use case - Many thanks!
@four43 yes, version 0.4.0 support Python 3.11 Thanks to @Darkheir
Nice! Thank you all! It's appreciated
Thanks a lot! Works like a charm and I could finally update my biggest project to 3.11 😄
Thanks a lot! Works like a charm and I could finally update my biggest project to 3.11 smile
Thanks a lot for your feedback, I'm glad it helped other people :)
I tested it on several of my projects and I didn't see any issue, but it doesn't coverall the possible usage so it is cool to see other people that tested it !
The Accessor implementation was dropped and S3path needs to support the new way of things :disappointed: