Closed jonasmalacofilho closed 1 year ago
HID_SUPPORT
which is introduced there (github link) is just a giant on-off switch for everything related to HID. HID-BPF is an extension of HID, so I guess if you don't want to have HID at all, then you also don't want its BPF extension.
USB_HID
selects HID
because that's the core code, it doesn't need all the drivers beneath. That's my understanding at least. And if CONFIG_HID_SUPPORT
is not y
, you don't get anything related to HID, as intended.
That makes sense. And thanks for the review.
Fixes recently failed actions: e.g. https://github.com/liquidctl/liquidtux/actions/runs/4248327829/jobs/7387378110. Related: torvalds/linux@25621bcc8976
This feels like a workaround though. Shouldn't
USB_HID
selectHID_SUPPORT
instead ofHID
?Personally, I don't find the descriptions in the linked commit that clear, but I guess it will be solved in upstream momentarily (if necessary).