A friend shared this example, where haku will misinterpret your intentions because parsers are dumb:
s #000000 x+0 y+1
Here my friend meant to pass x+0 and y+1 as arguments, but haku will interpret the expression as
(s #000000 x) + (0 y) + 1
Which is not at all what he wanted.
I'm not quite sure whether this should be an error or a warning; I'd lean towards always erroring in case function call infix is mixed with operator infix, because it can be really confusing, but arguably it shouldn't prevent compilation.
Emitting a non compilation-failing warning is definitely going to be more work, since right now we expect all diagnostics to be fatal.
A friend shared this example, where haku will misinterpret your intentions because parsers are dumb:
Here my friend meant to pass
x+0andy+1as arguments, but haku will interpret the expression asWhich is not at all what he wanted.
I'm not quite sure whether this should be an error or a warning; I'd lean towards always erroring in case function call infix is mixed with operator infix, because it can be really confusing, but arguably it shouldn't prevent compilation.
Emitting a non compilation-failing warning is definitely going to be more work, since right now we expect all diagnostics to be fatal.