Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This is an enhancement, didn't know how to change the type
Original comment by TVP.Sath...@gmail.com
on 22 Oct 2013 at 11:35
Isn't this exactly what Delegate.types does?
Original comment by Maaarti...@gmail.com
on 23 Oct 2013 at 7:54
[deleted comment]
Isn't there a better way to include/exclude getters/setters rather than
declaring them in an interface and declaring them as exclude/type in delegate?
For business-logic methods, it looks reasonable to extract them into interface
and control delegation, but not so for getters/setters. I am closing this issue
and raising another one as :add better way to exclude/include getters/setters
of composed class when using @Delegate". Hope that is OK to be picked up.
Original comment by TVP.Sath...@gmail.com
on 24 Oct 2013 at 7:46
How to close the issue or edit the title of the issue?
Original comment by TVP.Sath...@gmail.com
on 24 Oct 2013 at 7:55
Closing per request of reporter.
Original comment by askon...@gmail.com
on 4 Apr 2014 at 11:12
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
TVP.Sath...@gmail.com
on 22 Oct 2013 at 11:34