comments version 23.2.8

[litzvi]

1. add a new button for cashew use in Inventory reports.
2. show warehouse (it's in storage) for Storage moved in Cashew usage details
3. you can change the header to used/loaded for the details of Loading/InventoryUse.
4. adding qc packed items is adding bulk. (at the same time change the button from 'add undefined').
5. normal packing process dropdown also shows qc items.
6. In Qc packing, remove the sections of table option(QC packd amounts) and Waste amounts.
7. I also suggest before using dropdown to choose between qc hold, screen, floor instead of showing them all (there can be 20 lines in a po..).
8. in qc packing, QC packd amounts should allow not packed items, so we can make bags of say 22lbs and no need to create an item for everyone. (It's because of the way we are doing it, that it only becomes a 'qc item' when it's packed)

[litzvi]

after you do all this, try doing a realistic packing and loading for qc. because I don't even see it showing up in loading

[mei309]

1. done
2. done
3. done
4. done
5. done
6. done
7. not for now because it has implactions
8. im giving all qc items bulk and packed. (checked)

[mei309]

after you do all this, try doing a realistic packing and loading for qc. because I don't even see it showing up in loading

done and works

[litzvi]

after you do all this, try doing a realistic packing and loading for qc. because I don't even see it showing up in loading

done and works

did you try edit?

[mei309]

yup. i did

[litzvi]

EDIT QC PACKING DOESN'T WORK

[litzvi]

Also we should change the qc item setup. I suggest only Qc bulk items (no packed - doesn't make much sense). and when qc packing to give like in receiving so they can build there own constructs. Otherwise 50lb and smaller amounts will show in separate lines.

[mei309]

EDIT QC PACKING DOESN'T WORK

fixed

[mei309]

Also we should change the qc item setup. I suggest only Qc bulk items (no packed - doesn't make much sense). and when qc packing to give like in receiving so they can build there own constructs. Otherwise 50lb and smaller amounts will show in separate lines.

i think we only need to add the table view

[litzvi]

It won't display well on the loading report. let's try. Anyway i'll assume they aren't using it for next version. so we will check later.

[litzvi]

Also we should change the qc item setup. I suggest only Qc bulk items (no packed - doesn't make much sense). and when qc packing to give like in receiving so they can build there own constructs. Otherwise 50lb and smaller amounts will show in separate lines.

i think we only need to add the table view

I'm not sure, but if it's easy then add the table option and we'll see how it looks. If it's not to hard to allow bag weight and number of bags (like in receipt), it would be the best.

[mei309]

for now added table view

[mei309]

it looks great with table view and it dose the correct stuff in security and export reports

[litzvi]

See issue #573 on how qc needs to show in export report

[mei309]

7. done only in new qc packing. in edit it will cause another window on the way so i think its better this way

[mei309]

and about the qc in report we have issue 573

[mei309]

and on the qc items we have different places that we discussing the items so i will close the issue since all the major stuff of it re fixed

[litzvi]

1. done only in new qc packing. in edit it will cause another window on the way so i think its better this way

we need to be able to pack from a few pos, so a setup like loading is more suitable.

[mei309]

1. done only in new qc packing. in edit it will cause another window on the way so i think its better this way

we need to be able to pack from a few pos, so a setup like loading is more suitable.

i will do like packing. only later if and when we can upgrade both together

[litzvi]

i will do like packing. only later if and when we can upgrade both together

like packing is not suitable here, so no need. It's useless this way, they are just going to fabricate data.

[mei309]

i did it like packing so lets see how it goes

[litzvi]

ok. but it's bad, no doubt about that. We worked so things are smooth and easy, but making esoteric things very complicated. esoteric but done often

[mei309]

its not esoteric by me. thats the reason i dont want to do it now and also its not that difficult this way

[litzvi]

its not esoteric by me. thats the reason i dont want to do it now and also its not that difficult this way

esoteric in the process

[mei309]

we have a issue (597) about this so no point in this one open