Closed williamdes closed 1 year ago
Looks like Yahoo and Aol use the same tool for generating DMARC report. Logically, this is an incorrect report, which is what the utility reports. What would you suggest to do with that? Alternatively, you can set up a filter on the mail server to remove such reports from the mailbox.
Looks like Yahoo and Aol use the same tool for generating DMARC report. Logically, this is an incorrect report, which is what the utility reports. What would you suggest to do with that? Alternatively, you can set up a filter on the mail server to remove such reports from the mailbox.
Maybe it can remain as Invalid but have code to handle this specific misbehavior to have a more user friendly error in the console output?
What do you have in mind, to change error message? Do you have such a file? Its size is 38 bytes, so there is not only this word there.
What do you have in mind, to change error message?
Since it's a "common" bad implementation maybe it can be handled by a custom error message ?
What do you have in mind, to change error message? Do you have such a file? Its size is 38 bytes, so there is not only this word there.
Here is the file
cat \!domain.tld\!1682726400\!1682812799.xml.gz | base64
H4sIAKImTmQAAyvNKy1OTQEA+UgslAYAAAA=
To restore it and see the text
echo 'H4sIAKImTmQAAyvNKy1OTQEA+UgslAYAAAA=' | base64 -d | gunzip
unused
Oh, I forgot about gzip!
Is this checking really necessary? The utility already rejects the report on the basis of a too small file size without even looking in it. Is there any reason to add this exception to check for "unused" later at a next level?
Not really, that's good you now know that they do such things
Yahoo sends DMARC reports with
unused
as the XML content. Could this be handled in a more nicely way, not sure it should go to invalid action ?Ref: https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/136ilje/unused_in_dmarc_aggregate_report/
Aol.fr also does that..