search

liud4 / rVMAP

Data Management code for VMAC-MAP study
Other
3 stars 0 forks source link

Add informant completed SCD for ccqself and ecogself #43

Closed liud4 closed 4 years ago

liud4 commented 4 years ago

https://github.com/liud4/rVMAP/blob/d03b7b760fd81e0585750e56de61f9de94626b7c/R/derive_cognitive_complaint.R#L7

liud4 commented 4 years ago

For ecogself related variables, the corresponding informant variables are ecoginf_xx. For ccqself relate variables, the corresponding informant variables are ccqinformxx.

omair-a-khan commented 4 years ago

@liud4, I don't understand what this issue is about. Could you please provide some more detail?

liud4 commented 4 years ago

Each SCD questionnaires were also completed by their informant. This issue is to add the derived information SCD variables to the merge dataset.

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:36 AM Omair A. Khan notifications@github.com wrote:

@liud4 https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fliud4&data=02%7C01%7Cdandan.liu%40vanderbilt.edu%7Ce72055be52d14c48f25308d7d7134819%7Cba5a7f39e3be4ab3b45067fa80faecad%7C0%7C0%7C637214350119938503&sdata=H%2Fm%2Fo3Nz5wxqQB9zKdmKYcXNCctw9oN5mwUOSYJJvWQ%3D&reserved=0, I don't understand what this issue is about. Could you please provide some more detail?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fliud4%2FrVMAP%2Fissues%2F43%23issuecomment-607885049&data=02%7C01%7Cdandan.liu%40vanderbilt.edu%7Ce72055be52d14c48f25308d7d7134819%7Cba5a7f39e3be4ab3b45067fa80faecad%7C0%7C0%7C637214350119938503&sdata=Xo7jh9ALC9tkWn3MpfxAhmq1MXPMQOBdhW7RY6VioeI%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribe https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAH4KUAOSUERFBXKOWYWPCG3RKSPIFANCNFSM4LM53PRA&data=02%7C01%7Cdandan.liu%40vanderbilt.edu%7Ce72055be52d14c48f25308d7d7134819%7Cba5a7f39e3be4ab3b45067fa80faecad%7C0%7C0%7C637214350119948495&sdata=NRhCcb3caFMhFPE5H4JhOjz7mT1023ScGo8%2Bf6%2FBO3E%3D&reserved=0 .

-- Dandan Liu, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

omair-a-khan commented 4 years ago

While there is no ccqself44 or ccqself45 in our dataset, we do have ccqinform44 and ccqinform45. To derive ccqinform.tot, should I include the 44 and 45 when I call the total_score function on these variables?

omair-a-khan commented 4 years ago

To document our phone call today, the answer to my question is that we will mirror the derivation for the ccqself.tot, i.e. we will not include ccqself44 or ccqself45 in the calculation.